In R. P.
Cant and R. A. Aroni’s article, “Exploring dietitians’ verbal and nonverbal
communication skills for effective dietitian-patient communication,” a two-part study is conducted to learn about
how communication plays a role in the relationship between dietitians and their
clients.
To begin
with, the authors provide a brief summary of what is already known, or at least
expected, of a good customer-professional relationship in the health
field. The importance of this study is
quickly brought up by contrasting the common beliefs of relationships between
nurses and their patients versus dietitians and their clients. It is very easy to understand the connection
between a nurse and a patient because most people can relate to the experience
and will more often than not comment on how “communication and issues of trust
are linked to a perception of competence.”
Most people strongly desire such a quality in the person who is assigned
to take care of them because in most cases, being communicative and dependable
is what results in feeling cared for. In
the case of dietitians, however, not much information is known, at least not on
the same level of public knowledge as the nurses’ situation. The data we have on dietitians is almost
always about the outcome of a client’s progress under the dietitians’
instruction. There has very seldom been
any research investigating the relationship between the client and the
dietitian that doesn't have to do with simply educating the client about what
the expert knows. Due to this lack of
information in the dietetics field, the first part of the investigation was
launched.
To find data about communication,
researchers first had to tailor a questionnaire for dietitians to determine how
THEY felt about their relationships with their clients. A questionnaire was developed and response
entries were submitted online in 2006 to have practicing dietitians evaluate
themselves about certain skills, methods, strategies, and characteristics in
terms of customer service. The results
of the questionnaire were processed and clustered into four domains of
communication competence. The four
domains were: interpersonal, nonverbal, professional, and counseling
competence. These domains became the
basis for the second part of the communication investigation in dietetics.
From the results of the second part,
the researchers concluded that the goal in effective communication is to maintain
a non-hierarchical role with the client. A
good example to use as a perspective would be the ability to “empathize without
judgment.” Empathy is the key to having
a healthy relationship with the client but first the dietitians have to be
provided the opportunity to empathize, which is overcoming the barrier between
their clients when the dietitians themselves are perceived as a total
stranger. The researchers suggest that
decreasing unpredictability in the relationship would help break the image of a
stranger. To do so, dietitians were
instructed to outline the sessions ahead of them and account for all types of
unpredictability. Furthermore, nonverbal
communication can be of tremendous help when trying to gain a trusty
communication with their client.
When comparing the results across the
different areas of the field, research shows that no notable difference was
prevalent in the way that dietitians evaluated themselves. The results also indicate that displaying
positive amounts of interpersonal, nonverbal, professional, and counseling
communication is a “desirable” trait that clients appreciate when their
dietitians are conveying nutritional education with them. This makes it simpler when it comes to
implementing the value of communication for future dietitians, regardless of
where they practice. Therefore, the end
result of the study proves that communication, both verbal and nonverbal, in
the dietetics field is just as important as in any other profession.
Works Cited
Cant, R. P. and Aroni, R. A. (2008), Exploring dietitians’
verbal and nonverbal communication skills for effective dietitian–patient
communication. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 21: 502–511.
No comments:
Post a Comment